Evaluating Professional Development (1-off Series) [Thomas R. Guskey] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a practical guide to. Evaluating Professional. Development. By. Thomas R. Guskey. University of Kentucky. (Article reprinted with permission from Dr. Guskey). Evaluating Professional Development has 27 ratings and 3 reviews. June said: A very user friendly book to guide evaluation efforts at the state and local.

Author: Gardabar Zolor
Country: Mali
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 25 April 2010
Pages: 230
PDF File Size: 9.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.18 Mb
ISBN: 905-8-19527-904-2
Downloads: 12391
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: JoJotaxe

Thomas Feller added it Feb 04, Jay Salikin is currently reading it Sep 29, Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. How can we go about reaching some consensus about what is important? Organizational support prodessional necessary to gain high quality implementation of new policies and practices.

They want to see improvements in assessment results or test scores, increased attendance, fewer discipline problems, or decreased dropout rates.

I found this book about professional development by Gusky to be well informed and prepared.

Doing ineffective things longer doesn’t make them any better. A graduate of the University of Chicago, he began his career in education as a middle school teacher, served as an administrator in Chicago Public Schools, and was the first Director of the Center for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning, a national educational research center. The book asks and answers significant questions and provides specific recommendations for future action.

Planning guskeyy carefully and more intentionally not only makes dvaluating easier, it also leads to much more effective professional development.

A couple of years ago, I identified thirteen lists of characteristics of effective professional development that had been assembled by different professional organizations and research groups.


And a fourth guskdy considered how the training affected their productivity. For example, they describe the importance of extended time for professional development and the need to ensure that activities are ongoing and job-embedded. Mjjohnson rated it it was amazing Mar 05, Emily Klein rated it it was ok Aug 19, What is your five-level model for evaluating professional development, and how did proefssional come to be?

Immediately following any professional development activity, I can gather information about levels one and two—finding out if people liked it and what they gained from that experience in terms of new knowledge and skills. The Professional Development of Teachers: First, each of these five levels is important in its own right. These Standards represent an attempt to give people in the field some guidelines for their work and some criteria by which to judge the effectiveness of their efforts.

Olimpio Torres marked it as to-read Dec 19, Why are levels four and five of your evaluation model—in which professional development is linked to student outcomes—so difficult to accomplish?

Evaluating Professional Development

This isn’t because they are afraid of guskwy. Georgie rated it really liked it Jan 19, Nicholas Little rated it really liked it Sep 15, But most policymakers, legislators, and school leaders are not asking for ironclad proof. Each level provides different types of information that can be used in both formative and summative ways.

User Review – Flag as inappropriate I found this book about professional development by Gusky to be well informed yuskey prepared. So, in planning professional development, we must include some mechanism whereby those responsible for implementation can gain evidence of success from their students rather quickly—within the first month of implementation.


The evaluation processes and tools recommended in this book acknowledge that if staff development is to improve student learning, many levels of change are required, each with its own particular evaluation challenges.

Refresh and try again. It requires a level of experimental rigor guskeyy is hard and often impossible to attain in practical school settings.

What do you hope people take away from your model? Guskey Limited preview – Kim Timmerman rated it really liked it Jun 12, Their hope is that this will lead to improved results from various funded programs. Susan Carmody added it Oct 08, I gave feedback when requested and occasionally just because I had an opinion. What they want is evidence that things are getting better.

Trivia About Evaluating Profes Want to Read Currently Reading Read.

Evaluating Professional Development – Thomas R. Guskey – Google Books

I share their hope. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. We also need to involve multiple stakeholders in the planning process to identify the sources of evidence profezsional they believe provide the best and most valid representation of success. Laura Bryan rated it liked it Feb 02, Some experts suggest that when educators engage in professional development endeavors, results might not be evident for two or three years.

No trivia or quizzes yet.